As in my Back Story post, coming up with and using this research method is why I self-publish. What I’m going to describe here is something you can – and I believe should – go out and try for yourself on your agent picks.
It goes as follows:
(1) Research agents you’d like to represent you. As a budding author you’ve probably already done this, and if you haven’t you should, because even if you’re going to self publish I’d advise it’s better that choice be well-informed.
(2) We’re now going to do the same process for the top three agents from that list.
By the way, I’m assuming they’re probably a bit ambitious for you to go for (ie. they’re established industry names and you’re unknown) but you also have hope based on all the things they have in their bio and say online about finding undiscovered talent in their slush pile and helping develop it.
Why not?
…but I’d also like to share the actual overheard quote from an actual agent (shouted into a telephone) that started me thinking about self-publishing:
“I don’t want a f*#%ing project, I want something I can sell.”
Universally true? Do you know, I think maybe.
(3) Go to your agents’ ‘clients’ page. Here you’ll usually find some 40-60 authors they represent (which is a bit of a red flag in and of itself – how much time does that equate to per client?)
You’ve probably already been here, and probably imagined just 10% of what the top names here are doing as something you’d be happy with; I bet you would! (note implied conditional).
But for this method we’re going directly to the bottom of that list (or focus on the authors you’ve never heard of if the list is alphabetised). Work upwards until you find the first near match for your gender, colour, class and age. This is our target.
(4) We’re now going to go just the right side of the line on cyberstalking the target…and the brilliant thing about this industry is every-damn-one promotes every-damn-thing about themselves, so this is very easy to do. Specifically:
* The agency’s author page for the target.
* If the target has a publisher, the publisher page for the target.
* The Amazon author page for the target.
* The target’s own website.
* Social media feeds for the agent and publisher (search within these or via Google for mentions of the target).
* (most importantly) The target’s own social media feeds.
The aim here is to know the books the target author has out (and forthcoming) and to gauge their success and, most importantly, who did the work to make that happen (and how).
(5) Next up we’re going to do some sales maths.
In the credits column we want an idea of the lifetime sales of that book. Okay, this is tricky because it’s not public info. Except in ways it is: sometimes an author will post on social media if they just hit 1,000, 5,000, 10,000 copies, etc.. Also if you’re able to follow a target author’s book from release you can use this sales calculator from Kindlepreneur to get a good idea of sales volumes (the bulk of which are usually in the first month). Similarly any historic chart positions (which are invariably publicised on social media) can be used with current chart titles to extrapolate sales volumes.
A quick aside to say that yes, I do focus mostly on Amazon. In part this is because you can get accurate sales figures for it from chart rank, but mostly it’s because it dominates the market with around 50% of physical book sales and 80% of ebook sales. Almost any book getting market traction is probably seeing 2/3rds of its volume go via Amazon (thus add 50% to any Amazon-only number to get a whole market estimate).
I’m sorry if you’re getting a headache here! Basically do this as detailed or sketchy as you like – the aim is to make a guess at lifetime sales for the target’s books (times number of books published). If any maths is too much maths for you then you can just go with 5,000 based on eg. this article. My view is this falls somewhere between realistic and optimistic for the target author…because if they were doing this they would be higher up the agent’s client list.
(6) Next we want to change that sales volume into an annual income.
The first detail we want for that is the royalty percentage the target author is receiving after the publisher and agent take their share. I’m going to avoid getting complex here and just say that over hardback and paperback (most sales volume is paperback) the average publishing deal pays 7% of RRP royalty and out of that the agent takes 15%, which we can add up to give a combined author royalty of 6%.
Yes, I know some readers will be frowning about this, to which I’d answer, have you noticed how every headline deal figure (eg. car rental) in the world seems to get worse for you once it goes into detail? So why would this be different?
I want to stress here that I urge you to calculate the target author figures as accurately as you can: the whole point of this exercise is to see through all the smoke and mirrors of the publishing industry and the overhyped numbers across the internet and actually see, up close, what someone like you IF you got this agent and a publishing deal with a major publisher, would likely be getting by way of hard, take-home cash.
But by way of a working average, let’s say the target author puts out 1 book per year selling at £10 ($13) and gets 5,000 lifetime sales of that book at a 6% royalty.
£10 x 5,000 x 6% = £3,000
(or $13 x 5,000 x 6% = $3,900)
Maybe this is less than you expected, but it’s consistent with this research, and that’s in the pre-AI era…!
But what about the advance? For fiction by a debut, unknown author it would greatly surprise me if it’s bigger than the £3,000 ($3,900) figure above. Yes, 6-figure deals happen, but so do lottery wins. One of the few sensible articles online about this says maybe a little more, but if there’s a trend then fiction novel advances are declining.
Grim, right?
(7) Well now it’s about to get grimmer!
How and why? Two main reasons:
a) Cost to the author of getting a manuscript to the level required to get an agent.
b) Cost to the author of the publicity required to generate those sales.
Starting with a), because of the absurd imbalance between supply and demand in this industry, agents (see the agent quote above) have a lot of choice over who they represent. They therefore – logically, because literary agencies are businesses – mostly go with the books which are of the required quality and arrive needing the least work to get to a saleable state.
At this point a question – does a professional editor make your book better? That’s a clear yes. A second question – are there wannabe authors out there prepared to invest in editing services so their manuscript becomes more attractive to agents? Again a clear yes, and in fact I’d say it’s becoming the norm (and I’m an editor by profession).
Gulp, okay…so how much does an editor cost? Well that depends on the level of editing and also manuscript length, but £2,000 ($2,600) is a low-ball average. (But okay, a caveat is that if you get a multi-book deal with a publisher they should pay for all editing from book two onwards…unless they drop you of course!)
Now b), and what you’ll be able to see from researching your target author is that these days authors are expected to do a LOT of the marketing. Firstly the agent/publisher will want you to tap up (the hell out of) your friends, family, co-workers, etc. until they’re sick of seeing your name. They’ll also want you to do bookshop signings, talk to reading groups, do interviews, etc.. And if it’s in some distant town and you’d need to take a day off work, drive 100 miles each way, eat out there, and perhaps even stay in a hotel for the night? From what I could see on socials the norm is you’d do it, and whilst you can save the receipts to deduct as expenses against royalty revenue, the publisher/agency will not be reimbursing any of this. I guess you could say no, but my assumption is the agency/publisher would take that as a signal you’re not serious about your career as an author…
So can we put a value on this? Perhaps if you do careful research, but for the sake of drama I’m going to go with a book-lifetime average cost of this of £1,000 ($1,300).
And thus we arrive at a figure of zero income if you get a named agent, a major publisher, and have a lifetime sales figure of 5,000 per book.
(8) But the silver lining must surely be that you’re building a career and those high-calibre professionals in the agency and publishing house will be there to support you as you learn, succeed, and finally earn?
I’m really sorry to keep doing this to you, but of all the gut-punches in my own use of this method, this next one was the worst…
I tracked Twitter, Facebook and Instagram feeds for my (three) target (middle-aged unknown white guy with a debut fiction novel) authors and got a handle on who from the publisher/agent side was doing what for how long and with what sort of budget. All three looked similar from what I could see:
* Advances paid by publishers were small or none. I base this on no mention being made of one (agents tend to mention ‘5-figure’ advances extensively when they get them for new authors).
* I think the named agents allotted very little of either their name power or their own time to the authors. Possibly it was as limited as the odd retweet, with assistants (graduate interns) seeming to be the more involved (based on Twitter activity).
* The publisher also didn’t appear to allocate much marketing time or budget to the authors’ books. What I was able to see looked like low-cost strategies run by fairly junior employees for a period of only around two weeks around the publication date.
* Beyond that publisher/agent seemed to be setting up some promotion ‘opportunities’ for the authors such as bookshop signings, talking to readers’ groups, etc., but, as above, I assume all of the associated travel and other costs were covered entirely by the authors.
* Amazon sales appeared unspectacular (probably in the hundreds) and reviews numbers were equally low (below 100).
(9) So my conclusion from all of this?
It was that even if I managed to attain the holy grail of a big-name agent and major publisher, it would amount to little more than a basic platform from which it would once again be me being required to promote and prove myself largely at my own expense (ie. financial and also social media time/energy/contacts). And from this position the majority still fail (in the sense of ever making a living as a novelist).
BUT I’m not saying “Never Pursue This Traditional Route”. My advice is simply to understand what it’s likely to offer you (based on detailed research) and weight that up against your other options carefully.
In my case, as a professional editor I could self edit. THAT’S quite a claim! …but in fact (after being quoted $80 per hour from every editor I was impressed enough by to approach – way beyond my means) I developed a methodology for doing reasonably effective self-editing.
And I’ve written it up and it’s available in full for free on this same website.
Also, I know how to typeset a manuscript and do all the publication process complete with personal (non-Amazon) ISBNs and so on. My wife (www.studioannadahlberg.com) is a designer and so can do book covers, adverts and video teasers.
These are substantial costs you’d normally expect a publisher to bear, so for me it tipped the balance firmly in favour of self-publishing. I also believe that AI is going to undermine a LOT of what traditional publishers do and dramatically tip the balance away from them…but that’s another blog post.
I want to end this tome of a post by saying that it’s aim is DYOR (do your own research). As in really do it, with eyes and mind open, and then make a hard-nosed decision about what’s best for you. Literature may present as a nice, fluffy industry, but…